- 295 May 2010
- 294 April 2010
- 293 March 2010
- 292 February 2010
- 291 January 2010
- 290 December 2009
- 289 October 2009
- 288 September 2009
- 287 April 2009
- 286 February 2009
- 285 November 2008
- 284 September 2008
- 283 July 2008
- 282 April 2008
- 281 March 2008
- 280 January 2008
- 279 November 2007
- 278 July 2007
- 277 May 2007
- 276 March 2007
- 275 January 2007
- 274 December 2006
- 273 October 2006
- 272 July 2006
- 271 May 2006
- 270 March 2006
- 269 January 2006
- 268 December 2005
- 267 October 2005
- 266 September 2005
- 265 May 2005
- 264 April 2005
- 263 January 2005
- 262 December 2004
- 261 November 2004
- 260 June 2004
- 259 May 2004
- 258 April 2004
- 257 March 2004
- 256 February 2004
- 255 January 2004
- 254 October 2003
- 253 September 2003
- 252 April 2003
- 251 February 2003
- 250 january 2003
- 249 November 2002
- 248 september 2002
- 247 july 2002
- 246 april 2002
- 245 march 2002
- 244 february 2002
- 243 December 2001
- 242 october 2001
- 241 September 2001
- 240 may 2001
- 239 april 2001
- 238 february 2001
- 237 January 2001
- 236 october 2000
- 235 september 2000
- 234 may 2000
- 233 april 2000
- 232 february 2000
- 231 january 2000
- 230 November 1999
- 229 september 1999
- 228 may 1999
- 227 april 1999
- 226 march 1999
- 225 february 1999
- 224 december 1998
- 223 november 1998
- 222 october 1998
- 221 may 1998
|
|
OMI DOCUMENTATION
No.
257 - March 2004
|
|
Missionaries
to Secularity
General
Council’s Ongoing Formation Committee
|
One of the themes that emerged from the General Chapter of 1998 was the idea
that perhaps the most important and difficult mission field in the world today
is not, as in former times, the mission in the developing world, but the Western
world where secularity is, too much, greying and emptying our churches and making
it ever more difficult for us to pass the faith on to a new generation. At the
end of Chapter, the new General Administration was explicitly challenged "to
do something" in terms of missiology for those parts of the Congregation
where the Oblates work in a culture of secularity.
With this in mind, the General Council organized two symposia entitled "Missionaries
to Secularity". The first was hosted by St. Paul University, Ottawa,
and took place June 20-22, 2002, and second was hosted by Oblate School
of Theology and the Oblate Renewal Centre, San Antonio, Texas, and took
place October 3-5, 2002. Each event, despite being invitational, attracted
more than 150 persons. About half of the participants were Oblate and about
half were laypersons or other religious and priests. Both were events of communal
prayer, communal search, high energy, intellectual stimulation, and Oblate fraternity.
Both events too were international in character, drawing people from every continent,
albeit, given the locale, the majority of participants were from North America.
THE OTTAWA SYMPOSIUM
At
the Ottawa event, our key resource persons were John Shea, a theologian-writer,
story-teller, from Chicago, now working in health ministry, who spoke on,
"The New Dialogue with Secularity: Multidimensional Spiritual Living";
Richard Rohr, a Franciscan priest from the Center for Action and Contemplation
in Albuquerque, New Mexico, perhaps the most popular Catholic speaker in America,
who spoke to us about "Singing Songs of Sion in a Foreign Land";
Gilles Routhier, a professor of Theology from Laval University in Quebec
City, whose voice is much respected vis-à-vis the question of how the Church
might respond to secularity and whose presentation was entitled, "Risquer
plonger en eau profonde: non plus seulement réaménager, mais retrouver les gestes
des bâtisseurs"; Michael Downey, a theologian and writer who works
full-time for the Cardinal's office in Los Angeles who spoke to us about "Theology's
Prime Commandment: Understanding God's Kenosis"; and Vivian Labrie,
who works full-time with and for the poor in Quebec City and who reminded us
of the place of the poor within missiology in her presentation, "Jeter
les bases des sociétés sans pauvreté: Comment?"
We had also invited a number of persons to lead focus sessions, namely, Maxime
Chaigne, Edward Beck, Sandy Prather, Denis Paquin, JoAnne Chafe, Bishop Jim
Weisgerber, Normand Provencher, Chief Harry Lafond, Bobert Michel, and Bishop
Gerald Wiesner.
We didn't write up any manifestos at the end, but, based on our conversations
and the insights of our resource persons, we did write up a series of "missiological
principles" which can, we feel, point us in the right direction. What
are these principles? We list here ten of them:
1) We are at a new place today in terms of the faith. Adaptation of what has
worked in the past may not be enough. We need to re-inflame the romantic imagination
within Christianity.
2) Secularity is not the enemy; it's our own child, sprung from Judeo-Christian
roots. Like any adolescent child, suffering from an understandable youthful
grandiosity, it's not bad, just unfinished. Our relationship to it shouldn't
be adversarial but one of solicitude. The "soil" of secularity is
defined by Jesus in the parable of the Sower – some ground is good, some hostile,
some indifferent – but the fact that some ground is hostile or indifferent does
not absolve us from the mandate to keep on sowing.
3) Spirituality is peoples' birthright. The secular culture hungers for spirituality,
but is largely spiritually illiterate. People go where they get fed.
4) Recovering the tradition is a great labour. We must seek to rediscover the
core, heart, of our tradition, beyond its encrusted accretions, and then put
our own passion to that heart. We must work at finding our own faith-voice and
then speak in an invitational way. Part of this must be a profound asceticism
of listening.
5) A potentially fertile image of Christ for our time might well be Christ
as the kenosis of God. This perhaps can be the place of contact with the
secular world. Christ, in his self-emptying, expresses a love which gives itself
and seeks nothing in return, incarnates God's presence without pretence, reveals
a God of total non-violence and vulnerability, a God of pure invitation, and
a God who accepts the provisionality of everything. Jesus' essential message
is a universal message of vulnerability that all people need to hear.
6) Given this self-emptying God, we might remind ourselves that sharing in the
mission of Christ does not always mean using words about Jesus. God can give
us permission, when necessary, to take a holiday from religious language.
7) As a faith community we are in exile – from the power, possessiveness, and
prestige of the past – but we should remember that all transformation happens
in exile because that is the only time God can get at us. We need to stay with
the pain, the exile, the kenosis, and hold the tension long enough until it
changes us.
8) There are four aspects of the Church that people still do accept: the Church
as an agency to serve the poor, the Church as delivering the rites of passage,
the Church as a voice within ethical discourse, and the Church as a "beautiful
heritage"; but we must be careful to not let ourselves be identified with
only these. Perhaps too we are asking our parishes to carry too many things,
asking them to do some things they can no longer do. Parish and mission are
not co-terminus. We need to ask ourselves: Do we need new structures, beyond
and outside the parish, new "missiological" structures to supplement
what parishes can do? Can we dream of new "ecclesial houses"?
9) The gospel is ultimately about God rescuing the poor. Part of evangelization
is the movement to eliminate poverty. The Church is a big international body
and it could do a lot, internationally, as regards poverty. But, if we want
to work for the poor, we must free ourselves from too much reliance on dogma
and rely more upon human solidarity.
10) There are human foundations, solid ones, for moral progress within our culture
and we need to accept this and widen the pool of sincere people with whom we
form one body to work for a better world. Excessive stress on denominational
identification can narrow the body. Interreligious dialogue must lead us back
to a common humanity. We need to commit ourselves not just to the baptized,
but to all people of sincerity and good-will.
THE SAN ANTONIO SYMPOSIUM
At
the San Antonio symposium our key resource persons were John Shea, who
had also been with us in Ottawa and spoke of "Gospel Stories: Resources
for Contemporary Spiritual Living"; John O'Donohue, a colourful theologian-philosopher-writer
from the West coast of Ireland whose writings in spirituality are both very
respected and very popular and whose presentation was entitled, "Poetics
of Presencing: An Exploration of a Spiritual Landscape When the Old Wells Run
Dry": Robert Schreiter, from Catholic Theological Union in Chicago,
who is one of the most respected writers in missiology in the English-speaking
world and who clarified the landscape of secularity for us with his presentation,
"Pathways to a New Evangelization in the First World"; Robert Barron,
a young diocesan priest who teaches systematic theology at Our Lady of the Lake
Seminary in Chicago whom we affectionately dubbed "the young Father Barron"
and who brought the voice of a younger generation of Catholic thinkers with
his presentation, "A Missiology of Aesthetics: The Icon of Jesus as
a Paradigm; and Mary Jo Leddy, who teaches theology and spirituality
at Regis College in Toronto and is the founder of Romero House and spoke to
us about "Naming the Present Moment: Culture, Spirituality and Missiology".
Our focus sessions leaders were: Marion Gil, Sandy Prather, Joanne Chafe,
Wayne Holzt, Staurt Bate, Paul Fachet, and Ron Rolheiser.
Again, as in Ottawa, no formal proceedings were written up, though a book on
both symposia will eventually be published. We did however again synthesize
the insights into "50 missiological principles". Here are ten
of those principles:
1) Secularity is both a restriction of consciousness and a widening and freeing
of it. It is spiritually interested, but largely spiritually illiterate, not
so much bad as asleep. Evangelization is very much about waking someone to another
reality. Liberals and conservatives are asleep in different ways, liberal ideology
is too privatized and conservative ideology too re-entrenched in authority and
rules, even as our culture had replaced the ideal of a good life by the vision
of having more.
2) How does one become spiritual without leaving behind the physical, the emotional,
the sexual, and the bodily? To move beyond churches that are weary, grey, and
tired, we must move beyond clericalism, fear of the feminine, excessive unease
with Eros, false reliance on authority, and reclaim our mystical and our intellectual
traditions.
3) Jesus offers a model: He tries to wake us from both our distractions and
from the ways we habitually fall asleep "out of sorrow". We need to
begin our proclamation with what lies at the centre of our faith: Christ has
died and has risen. We kill God, but God returns in a forgiving love and this
is what opens up a new world. What's unique to Christianity is that God gives
himself as friendship, love, forgiveness, non-violence, empathy, compassion.
4) We must listen to our contemplatives: our poets, artists, mystics, and returning
missionaries. They will help tell us what's best and worst in secularity and
help us form an alternative imagination, an alternative to the "myth-of-progress".
5) There are three levels to evangelization: i) The renewal of the evangelizers
themselves; ii) a calling back of those who have heard the gospel, but it has
not taken hold or been lost in some way; and iii) a calling of those have not
yet heard the gospel. Our own children mostly fall into the second category.
6) Today's secularity has a particular set of characteristics: i) It is an
uneven terrain. ii) You cannot measure it simply by declining church attendance
because there is still, in secularity, a strong, diffusive, belief in the supernatural,
a believing without belonging. iii) There is a resurgence of religious sensibility,
carried by, among other things, our immigrant communities and the rise of religious
movements.
7) Religious decline in secularity may be the exception rather than the way
the future is going. There are three different images of secularity that suggest
this: i) Secularity as receding and eroding; ii) as a veneer, you poke deeply
into it and see a teeming religiosity underneath, and iii) as an island within
a sea of religiosity (in a world perspective). Inside of our churches we,
too, are not homogeneous. We are not one generation but are two-and-half generations
within a single generation. As well, we should observe how various counter-cultural
groups are engaging secularity: fundamentalists, enthusiasm movements, social
justice groups, and the new conservatives. All these groups, both the right
and the left, have three things in common: i) They foster and feed-off a
sense of community. ii) They try to give clear form to life. iii) They call
for a clear set of actions.
8) We may not continue to keep our faith private. Evangelization must show itself
publicly, like the medieval pilgrimages and processions and today's papal youth
days. Faith must be expressed publicly, in colourful, romantic ways. We must
stop building "beige churches" and build churches that express public
faith. We are drowning in individuality.
9) Unless we can regain our own inner vision and define ourselves more by what
we are for then what we are against we will continue to divide from each other.
The Christian tradition offers that inner vision and throws light on a history
and upon realities beyond the here and now and, most importantly, calls us to
world citizenship, beyond our own backgrounds.
10) Finally, a few sound-bytes for reflection:
"When the sun shines right even the meanest trees sparkle." Flannery
O'Connor
"The cock will crow at the breaking of your own ego. There are lots of
ways to wake up!" John Shea
"We are better than we know and worse than we think." Mary Jo
Leddy
"We must gamble everything for love." Rumi
OMI
DOCUMENTATION is an unofficial publication
of the General Administration of the Missionary Oblates of Mary Immaculate
C.P. 9061, 00100 ROMA-AURELIO, Italy
Fax: (39) 06 39 37 53 22 E-mail : information@omigen.org
http://www.omiworld.org
Print this document
|